Image analysis 2

I started off with this image of my model against a brick wall, I did not want the brick wall to be shown in my magazine so I chose to cut the background out, to make it easier to use the wand tool I used the rubber tool to create an outline of where and what the wand should cut out.

As you can see this was the result of using the wand, so this then made it easier to rub out the brick wall that is closer to my model. I had to make sure that I deleted all of the brick wall but I also had to be careful that I did did not make the edges of my model look too ridged.

This is the end product of using the wand and rubber tools on my model.

I had the same issue with this model in that I did not want to show the brick wall in my magazine so I had to go through the same process of making an outline on the model with the rubber tool and using the wand to delete the majority of the brick wall.

Using the rubber tool I had to again go around the edges of my model to delete the brick wall.

Rubbing the edges out around this model does not look as good as the other model because it was harder due to the fact that I had to rub out the background that was near this models hair so it does not look as natural as the male model.

This is the end product of both of my models in one shot. As I was developing both of the images and  inserting them onto the double page spread I thought that because of the positioning of both of them they might fit together. For example, it was fortunate that the female models' hand was positioned in this way so that it looks like her hand is pressing up against the male models chest.

For all of the images of both of my models, the reason I chose to remove the background on all of them is because I felt that it would add to the effect of my magazine if the locations of my images was not shown.